![]() īelow you can see the front view size comparison of KEF LS50 and KEF Q150 in scale. In this section, we are going to compare KEF LS50's and KEF Q150's external dimensions. Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. Placing the speakers too close to the walls may cause the bass to sound boomy. Rear ported speakers generally need more room between the backside of the speaker and the wall compared to sealed and front/bottom ported speakers. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.īoth LS50 and Q150 have rear firing ports. LS50 features Post type posts and Q150 has a Post type posts. Such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speakerĬompared to a lower max handling speaker. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance, inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker. The extra height of the cabinet, along with insufficient thickness of the wood it's made from combine to create some pretty dire cabinet resonance which completely eliminates everything that was good about the 7's and 8's.Range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. You would expect the Coda 9's to be even better still, considering the extra bass driver hidden internally within the coupled-cavity cabinet but you would be disappointed as this is not the case. The 8's have a much fuller sound and bass so punchy that you could close your eyes and easily believe you were listening to much larger speakers. Personally I thought the Coda 8's were far better than the Coda 7's, despite not having the bi-wire option. ![]() Read our full KEF LS50 Wireless II review.The effect was a purer treble, clean mids, and a more defined bass, with the whole presentation, opened out, offering subtler but more precise detail and greater instrument separation. Its frequency response is perfect for watching movies and listening to music. ![]() The speaker has an omnidirectional response, which eliminates the sweet spot so you can listen anywhere with the speaker’s perfect sound quality. MAT is basically a clever way of absorbing sound waves that radiate from the rear of the tweeter dome so that they don’t distort the unit’s forward output, effectively creating an ‘acoustic black hole’ and absorbing 99 per cent of the unwanted sound. The KEF Q550 is an entry-level floor-standing speaker from KEF’s award-winning Q-series. In this review, we will be comparing LS50 and Q150, two Passive Bookshelf speakers by KEF Lets have a brief look at the main features of KEF LS50 and KEF Q150 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. The Wireless II address the LS50 Wireless' minor imperfections and, while proudly maintaining the familiar chassis and Uni-Q driver arrangement, manage to squeeze out even more performance by introducing a new KEF innovation called Metamaterial Absorption Technology (also found on its LS50 Meta passive speakers, and hopefully on many more KEF models to come). When it comes to innovative and entertaining sequels, Wayne's World 2 or Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo may spring to mind, but in 2020 KEF released the LS50 Wireless II all-in-one streaming speaker system and quickly earned a reputation as a follow-up of rare quality as well as a What Hi-Fi? Award. Which brings us to another LS50 descendent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |